![]() “ party opposing a properly supported motion for summary judgment may not rest upon mere allegation or denials of his pleading, but must set forth specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue for trial.” Anderson v. “The court shall grant summary judgment if the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Fed. We have plenary review over an order granting summary judgment. ![]() § 1291 (final decisions of district courts). This Court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. inflicts injury the government as an entity is responsible.” 3 Administrative searches conducted by health and safety officials are governed by the “controlling standard of reasonableness.” 4 The parties disagree whether exigent circumstances-an exception to the warrant requirement “that the law has traditionally The District Court had jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1 A § 1983 claimant must prove (1) “the conduct complained of was committed by a person acting under color of state law” and (2) “the conduct deprived the complainant of rights secured under the Constitution or federal law.” 2 A local government may be held liable under § 1983 “when execution of a government’s policy or custom. At summary judgment, the District Court dismissed Cannarozzo’s claim, concluding no Fourth Amendment violation occurred. He alleged the Defendants violated his Fourth Amendment right when Panzarella conducted a warrantless search of a five-unit apartment building he owned in response to a fire alarm. * Code Enforcement Officer and Building Code Official for the Borough, under 42 U.S.C. 5.7 does not constitute binding precedent. George Cannarozzo sued the Borough of West Hazelton and Diane Panzarella, a This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. (Filed: November 29, 2022) _ OPINION * _ FISHER, Circuit Judge. 34.1(a) NovemBefore: HARDIMAN, PORTER and FISHER, Circuit Judges. Mariani _ Submitted Pursuant to Third Circuit L.A.R. 3-18-cv-00267) District Judge: Honorable Robert D. BOROUGH OF WEST HAZELTON DIANE PANZARELLA _ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania (D.C. 22-1079 _ GEORGE CANNAROZZO, Appellant v. Five persons, including Lawr J Zarella, Vincent Zarella, Nicole Zarella, Carol Zarella Jr, Lawrence J Zarella, listed the phone number (978) 658-8936 as their own, various documents indicated.NOT PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _ No. Carol has (978) 658-8936 (Verizon New England, Inc), (978) 207-1669 (Comcast Phone Of Massachusetts, IncVerizon New England, Inc) as phone numbers. Based on the residence history, we can come to the assumption that at least one people, including Krista Zarella may know Carol. ![]() ![]() Wilmington, MA and North Reading, MA are Carol's previous cities. 55 Southwick Rd, North Reading, MA 01864 is included in Carol’s address history. We know that Carol Zarella Jr, Lawr J Zarella, and four other persons also lived at this address, perhaps within a different time frame. Carol’s current address is 82 Park Str, Wilmington, MA 01887-1528. Alternative name, for example, Carol Zarella could be used by Carol. Carol celebrated 78th birthday on March 31.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |